Alonso C, Otake S, Davies P, Dee S. An evaluation of interventions for reducing the risk of PRRSV introduction to filtered farms via retrograde air movement through idle fans. Veterinary microbiology 2012 [in press]
Abstract
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is an economically significant pathogen of pigs that can be transported via the airborne route out to 9.1 km. To reduce this risk, large swine facilities have started to implement systems to filter contaminated incoming air. A proposed means of air filtration failure is the retrograde movement of air (back-drafting) from the external environment into the animal air space through non-filtered points such as idle wall fans; however, this risk has not been validated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was threefold: (1) to prove that PRRSV introduction via retrograde air movement through idle fans is a true risk; (2) to determine the minimum retrograde air velocity necessary to introduce PRRSV to an animal airspace from an external source; and (3) to evaluate the efficacy of different interventions designed to reduce this risk. A retrograde air movement model was used to test a range of velocities and interventions, including a standard plastic shutter, a plastic shutter plus a canvas cover, a nylon air chute, an aluminum shutter plus an air chute and a double shutter system. Results indicated that retrograde air movement is a real risk for PRRSV introduction to a filtered air space; however, it required a velocity of 0.76 m/s. In addition, while all the interventions designed to reduce this risk were superior when compared to a standard plastic shutter, significant differences were detected between treatments.
ß 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
The goal of this blog is to register novel indexed papers about PRRS diagnostics, monitoring, control and elimination. This will include: reports of novel or improved diagnostic methods; papers about effictiveness of PRRS vaccines on pig performance, shedding and transmission; important news about PRRS virus structure and applied immunology; and much, much more. Stay tuned and be the first to know!
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Epidemiological investigations in regard to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Quebec, Canada. Part 2: Prevalence and risk factors in breeding sites
Lambert M, Arsenault J, Poljak Z, D S. Epidemiological investigations in regard to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Quebec, Canada. Part 2: Prevalence and risk factors in breeding sites. Preventive veterinary medicine 2012 [in press];
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a major threat for swine industry and understanding factors involved in its epidemiology is undoubtedly essential for disease control. As a part of a larger project, a cross-sectional study was performed on breeding sites in a moderate density area of swine production in Quebec to estimate the prevalence of PRRSV infected sites and to evaluate if characteristics of sites and biosecurity practices, either as specific measures or as a global score, were associated with PRRSV status. A questionnaire and diagnostic procedures were performed on 54 breeding sites between September 2006 and August 2008. A biosecurity score that had been previously computed using two-step clustering procedure was used, classifying breeding sites into two biosecurity patterns (high vs. low) according to 21 specific biosecurity measures. The apparent prevalence of PRRSV infected sites was 74.0% (95% CI, 60.3–85.0). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with robust standard errors adjusting for potential clustering of sites due to same ownership were computed. In a first multivariable model evaluating characteristics of sites and specific biosecurity variables, four main effects were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with PRRSV positive status: large pig inventory (OR: 10.7), proximity to closest pig site (OR: 7.3), absence of shower (OR: 8.7) and free access to the main entrance of the site by the rendering truck (OR: 7.0). In a second multivariable model including a global biosecurity score as a surrogate for a specific pattern of biosecurity measures, this score was not retained in the final model. The adjusted population attributable fractions were 16% for the proximity to closest pig site variable, 27% for the absence of shower variable, and 10% for the free access to main entrance of the site by the rendering truck. These two latter biosecurity measures, manageable directly on the site, should be prioritized and be part of any intervention strategy designed for PRRSV control.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a major threat for swine industry and understanding factors involved in its epidemiology is undoubtedly essential for disease control. As a part of a larger project, a cross-sectional study was performed on breeding sites in a moderate density area of swine production in Quebec to estimate the prevalence of PRRSV infected sites and to evaluate if characteristics of sites and biosecurity practices, either as specific measures or as a global score, were associated with PRRSV status. A questionnaire and diagnostic procedures were performed on 54 breeding sites between September 2006 and August 2008. A biosecurity score that had been previously computed using two-step clustering procedure was used, classifying breeding sites into two biosecurity patterns (high vs. low) according to 21 specific biosecurity measures. The apparent prevalence of PRRSV infected sites was 74.0% (95% CI, 60.3–85.0). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with robust standard errors adjusting for potential clustering of sites due to same ownership were computed. In a first multivariable model evaluating characteristics of sites and specific biosecurity variables, four main effects were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with PRRSV positive status: large pig inventory (OR: 10.7), proximity to closest pig site (OR: 7.3), absence of shower (OR: 8.7) and free access to the main entrance of the site by the rendering truck (OR: 7.0). In a second multivariable model including a global biosecurity score as a surrogate for a specific pattern of biosecurity measures, this score was not retained in the final model. The adjusted population attributable fractions were 16% for the proximity to closest pig site variable, 27% for the absence of shower variable, and 10% for the free access to main entrance of the site by the rendering truck. These two latter biosecurity measures, manageable directly on the site, should be prioritized and be part of any intervention strategy designed for PRRSV control.
Cost of PRRS in Netherlands.
Nieuwenhuis N, Duinhof T F, van Nes A. Economic analysis of outbreaks of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in nine sow herds. Veterinary record 2012 [in press].
Abstract
The economic losses due to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) outbreaks are reported in the literature to be substantially high, but recent figures are not available. The aim of this study was to quantify the economic effects of epidemic PRRSv outbreaks in Dutch sow herds. Nine sow herds were selected based on a confirmed PRRSv outbreak within those populations. The economic impact during the first 18 weeks after the outbreak was estimated by comparing the overall costs between pre- and postoutbreak periods, using different factors (production data, medication, diagnostics, labour, etc.). An outbreak of PRRSv resulted in a reduced number of sold pigs per sow of 1.7. The economic loss varied between €59 and €379 for one sow per 18-week period outbreak. The mean loss per sow per outbreak was €126. The costs after the outbreak varied significantly from €3 to 160 per sow, due to the different methods used by farmers to tackle PRRSv outbreaks. The calculated costs in this study correlate with the costs of the initial outbreak in The Netherlands of 98 per sow.
Abstract
The economic losses due to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) outbreaks are reported in the literature to be substantially high, but recent figures are not available. The aim of this study was to quantify the economic effects of epidemic PRRSv outbreaks in Dutch sow herds. Nine sow herds were selected based on a confirmed PRRSv outbreak within those populations. The economic impact during the first 18 weeks after the outbreak was estimated by comparing the overall costs between pre- and postoutbreak periods, using different factors (production data, medication, diagnostics, labour, etc.). An outbreak of PRRSv resulted in a reduced number of sold pigs per sow of 1.7. The economic loss varied between €59 and €379 for one sow per 18-week period outbreak. The mean loss per sow per outbreak was €126. The costs after the outbreak varied significantly from €3 to 160 per sow, due to the different methods used by farmers to tackle PRRSv outbreaks. The calculated costs in this study correlate with the costs of the initial outbreak in The Netherlands of 98 per sow.
Epidemiological investigations in regard to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Quebec, Canada. Part 1: Biosecurity practices and their geographical distribution in two areas of different swine density.
Lambert M, Poljak Z, Arsenault J, D S. Epidemiological investigations in regard to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Quebec, Canada. Part 1: Biosecurity practices and their geographical distribution in two areas of different swine density. Preventive veterinary medicine 2012;
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a considerable threat to the swine industry and implementing biosecurity measures is essential for the control of its transmission. The aims of this study were: (1) to describe biosecurity practices in production sites located in a moderate density (MD) and a high density (HD) pig area according to pro- duction type; (2) to group sites in different patterns according to their biosecurity practices; and (3) to determine the geographical distribution of sites according to biosecurity patterns. Biosecurity practices were selected based on PRRS epidemiology. A questionnaire was com- pleted on 125 breeding sites (MD = 54; HD = 71) and 120 growing (HD) sites, between 2005 and 2008. Depending on area and production type, the frequency of biosecurity practices used ranged from 0 to 2% for barrier at site entrance, 0 to 19% for use of shower, 25 to 35% for washing truck between loads of pigs, 51 to 57% for absence of rendering or rendering without access to the site, and 26 to 51% for absence of gilt purchase or purchase with quarantine. Better practices pertaining to entrance protocol (i.e. “no-entry” sign, shower, ≥24 h downtime) were reported more frequently on breeding sites in the MD than the HD area (P < 0.05). In the HD area, growing sites had in general a lower level of biosecu- rity than breeding sites. Using a two-step clustering procedure performed separately for breeding and growing sites, two different patterns were obtained for each production type, which corresponded to a high and low level of biosecurity. For breeding sites, a higher biosecurity level was observed at sites located away from other pig sites, set at more than 300 m from the public road, having higher sow inventory, or being part of an integrated production (P < 0.05). Spatial clusters of sites for each biosecurity pattern were detected. This study identified some shortcomings regarding biosecurity that should be addressed before implementing any PRRSV regional control. Vicinity of sites with different biosecurity levels also suggests difficulties in planning priorities of intervention based on geographical distribution of sites.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Efficient surveillance of pig populations using oral fluids
Abstract
Currently virus surveillance in swine herds is constrained by the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of sampling methods. The objective of this study was to assess the value of using oral fluids collected by barn personnel as a method of surveillance based on PCR testing. Approximately 12,150 pigs in 10 wean-to-finish barns on 10 farms were monitored for the presence of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), influenza A virus (IAV), and Torque teno virus genogroups 1 (TTV1) and 2 (TTV2) by sampling oral fluid specimens. Oral fluid samples were collected from 6 pens at each site starting at the time of pig placement (∼3 weeks of age) and continuing thereafter at 2-week intervals for a period of 18 weeks. Data were analyzed both on a pen basis and barn basis. Overall, 508 (85%) samples were positive for PCV2, 73 (12%) for PRRSV, 46 (8%) for IAV, 483 (81%) for TTV2, and 155 (26%) for TTV1 during the study period. The estimated arithmetic means of the quantitative PCR-positive oral fluids for PCV2, PRRSV, and IAV were 1×10(4.62), 1×10(4.97), and 1×10(5.49)per ml. With a single exception, all barns were positive for PCV2 and TTV2 at every sampling point in the study. Virus detection varied among barns, particularly for IAV and PRRSV. The pen level, cumulative distribution of agent combinations between all 10 barns were statistically different. The most commonly observed patterns were PCV2+TTV2 (239 pen samples, 40%), PCV2+TTV1+TTV2 (88 pen samples, 15%), and PCV2 alone (66 pen samples, 11%). This "proof-of-concept" project showed that a variety of viruses could be detected either intermittently or continuously in pig populations and demonstrated that barn herd virus status is highly variable, even among barns in the same production system. Oral fluid sampling is a promising approach for increasing the efficiency and cost effectiveness of virus surveillance in swine herds.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Ramirez A, Wang C, Prickett J R, Pogranichniy R, Yoon K, Main R, Johnson J K, Rademacher C, Hoogland M, Hoffmann P, Kurtz A, Kurtz E, Zimmerman J. Efficient surveillance of pig populations using oral fluids. Preventive veterinary medicine 2011 [in press].
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Downtime for PRRSv+Myco
Pitkin A, Otake S, Dee S. A one-night downtime period prevents the spread of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by personnel and fomites (boots and coveralls). J Swine Health Prod. 2011;19(6):345–348.
This paper summarizes observations recorded over a 4-year (1438-day) period regarding the ability of a 1-night period of downtime [+ shower and cloth-change] to prevent mechanical spread of porcine repro- ductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae between pig populations by personnel and fomites.
Keywords: swine, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, downtime, personnel, fomites
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Effect of PRRSv vaccine on the shedding of wild-type virus from an infected population of growing pigs
Linhares D C, Cano J P, Wetzell T, Nerem J, Torremorell M, Dee S A. Effect of modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) vaccine on the shedding of wild-type virus from an infected population of growing pigs. Vaccine 2011 [in press]
Abstract
There are ongoing efforts to eliminate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) from regions in the United States swine industry. However, an important challenge for the accomplishment of those efforts is the re-infection of pig units due to the area spread of PRRSv. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of PRRS modified-live virus vaccine (MLV) on viral shedding and on dynamics of PRRSv infection in pig populations raised under commercial conditions. The study composed of two rooms of 1000 pigs each. Ten percent of pigs of each room were inoculated with a field isolate of PRRSv. Rooms had separate air spaces and strict scientifically validated biosecurity protocols were adopted to avoid movement of pathogens between rooms. At 8 and 36dpi (days post inoculation), all pigs of the challenge-vaccine group were inoculated with a MLV vaccine. Pigs of the challenge-control group were placebo-inoculated. Blood and oral fluid samples were collected from each room at 0, 8, 36, 70, 96 and 118dpi for PRRSv RNA detection using PCR. PRRSv-antibodies were also screened from blood serum samples with a commercially available ELISA test. Additionally, tonsil scraping samples were collected from both groups at 70, 96 and 118dpi. Moreover, air samples were collected 6 times per week from 0 to 118dpi and were tested for PRRSv RNA using qPCR assay. There was no difference in the PRRSv infection dynamics measured as duration and magnitude of viremia and seroconversion. Also, there was no difference in the frequency of tonsil scraping samples PRRSv-positive by PCR. However, the challenge-vaccine group had significantly less PRRSv shed compared to the challenge-control group. The challenge-vaccine group had significant less PRRSv-positive oral fluids at 36dpi. Moreover, the challenge-vaccine group had significant reduction in the cumulative PRRSv shed in the air.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
- PMID:
- 22063389
- [PubMed]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)