Vaccine. 2014 Aug 6;32(36):4639-43. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.073. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
Reproductive, productivity, and mortality outcomes in late-gestation gilts and their litters following simulation of inadvertent exposure to a modified-live vaccine strain of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus.
1Pipestone Veterinary Clinic, 1300 S. Highway 75, Pipestone, MN 56164, USA. 2Outcomes Research, Zoetis Inc, 100 Campus Drive, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USA.
Abstract
The study evaluated the safety of a modified live-virus (MLV) porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) vaccine in susceptible, pregnant gilts. To simulate inadvertent exposure secondary to postvaccination shedding of PRRS-MLV, seronegative gilts (n=51) were exposed by IM vaccination at 90 days of gestation. Vaccinated and nonvaccinated, seronegative control gilts (n=25) were maintained in separate facilities. The PRRS-MLV vaccine was given in a 2mL dose on day 0. On day 7 all vaccinated gilts were PRRSV-PCR-positive for PRRSV and had responded serologically as determined by an ELISA. All control gilts remained PRRSV-PCR- and ELISA-negative throughout the study. Abortions did not occur in gilts from either group. The difference between vaccinated and control gilts
in average number of piglets per litter (12.43 and 12.16,
respectively), number of live births per litter (11.21 and 11.54), and
mean piglet birth weight (3.22 and 3.26 lbs) were not significantly
different. Piglets in the control group had significantly greater
average daily gain versus piglets from vaccinated gilts (0.52 vs. 0.46 lbs, P<0.0001). Preweaning mortality was significantly greater (P=0.0023) in piglets from the vaccinated gilts
(19.7% vs. 10.9%). A single gilt accounted for 18.2% of stillbirths in
the vaccinated group. Air samples were borderline PRRSV-PCR-positive for
PRRSV on days 29 and 32, after more than 98% of gilts had farrowed. Results demonstrated that vaccination of pregnant gilts at the time of peak fetal susceptibility was non-abortigenic and that the PRRS-MLV agent did not significantly affect reproductive outcomes. Lower ADG in piglets from vaccinated gilts may be due to PRRS-MLV viremia following transplacental or post-farrowing exposure. Air sampling results indicated that environmental contamination with PRRS-MLV shed from vaccinated gilts was minimal.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment