Monday, March 13, 2017

Chimeric PRRSV to enhance cross-protection among strains

 2016 Aug 5;34(36):4335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.069. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

Attempts to enhance cross-protection against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndromeviruses using chimeric viruses containing structural genes from two antigenically distinct strains.

Author information

1
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
2
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
3
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Iksan, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kwi0621@jbnu.ac.kr.
4
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
5
Viral Disease Division, Animal Plant Fisheries Quarantine Agency, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
6
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA; Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA. Electronic address: kyoon@iastate.edu.

Abstract

Due to significant antigenic variations between field isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), suboptimal cross-protection between different viruses impedes the effective control of PRRS via vaccination. Our previous study showed that chimeric viruses containing mixed structural genes from two distinct strains (VR2332 and JA142) of PRRSV were highly susceptible to the viral neutralizing activity of antisera generated against both parental strains. In this study, three chimeric viruses (JAP5, JAP56 and JAP2-6) were constructed by replacing ORF5, ORFs 5 and 6, and ORFs 2-6 of VR2332 with the corresponding genes of JA142, respectively, and their ability to confer cross-protection against challenge with the VR2332 and JA142 strains was evaluated in vivo. A total of 114 pigs were divided into 6 groups, and each group was intramuscularly injected with one of the 3 chimeric viruses (n=16 pigs per group), VR2332 (n=24), JA142 (n=24), or sham inoculum (n=18). At 44days post-inoculation (dpi), these pigs were further divided into 15 groups (n=6 or 8 pigs per group) and intranasally challenged with VR2332, JA142, or sham inoculum. All pigs inoculated with one of the chimeric viruses prior to challenge had lower viremia levels than the challenge control pigs. Prior inoculation with JAP56 markedly decreased viremia to nearly undetectable levels in pigs challenged with either VR2332 or JA142. These results suggest that chimeric viruses harboring mixed structural genes from two distinct PRRSV strains can provide protection against both donor viruses

KEYWORDS: 

Chimeric virus; Cross protection; Infectious clone; PRRSV; Reverse genetics; Structural genes; Vaccine
PMID:
 
27406935
 
DOI:
 
10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.069

No comments:

Post a Comment