Monday, March 13, 2017

Efficacy of type 1 MLV vaccine against a field type 2 PRRSv challenge

Efficacy of commercial genotype 1 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine against field isolate of genotype 2 PRRSV
By:Ko, SS (Ko, Seong-sik)1 ] Seo, SW (Seo, Sang-won)1 ] Sunwoo, SY (Sunwoo, Sun-young)1 ] Yoo, SJ (Yoo, Sung J.)1 ] Kim, MH (Kim, Myung-hyee)2 ] Lyoo, YS (Lyoo, Young S.)1 ]
VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
Volume: 172
 
Pages: 43-49
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.02.016
Published: APR 2016
Abstract
Although several recent studies have found that type 1 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) modified live virus (MLV) vaccine showed appreciable levels of cross-protection against type 2 PRRSV infection, the possibility of cross-protection between two genotype of PRRSV is still controversial. To determine potential protective efficacy against hetero-genotype field strain of PRRSV and to improve understandings of the mechanisms underlying performance improvement after infection in vaccinated animals, piglets were vaccinated with type 1 PRRSV MLV vaccine and challenged with type 2 field strain of PRRSV. As a result, vaccinated animals gained on average 8.45 kg in comparison to 4.77 kg measured in non-vaccinated animals during a 3-week period after viral challenge, which shows using a certain PRRSV vaccine could be clinically effective against heterologous genotypic virus challenge. In vaccinated animals, viremia was reduced and cleared rapidly, whilst viral load was much higher and reduced more slowly, indicating rebound viremia in non-vaccinated animals. The titers of neutralizing antibody against the type 2 PRRSV did not exceed the protective level in any animal from both vaccinated and control groups. Instead, antibody avidity of vaccinated animals was much higher than in the control group clearly. Furthermore, a strong negative correlation between antibody avidity and viremia was noted in 80% of vaccinated animals. Through those results from tests evaluating degree of antibody maturation and its relevance with clearing viremia, it could be suggested that non-neutralizing antibodies induced by vaccination prior to challenge might play a key role in protection against PRRSV infection, especially in early time course. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Author Information
Reprint Address: Lyoo, YS (reprint author) 
Konkuk Univ, Dept Immunopathol, Coll Vet Med, Neungdong Ro120, Seoul, South Korea.
Addresses:
      [ 1 ] Konkuk Univ, Dept Immunopathol, Coll Vet Med, Neung Dong St 120, Seuol, South Korea
      [ 2 ] Hipra Korea Inc, Jeongjail Ro 177, Songnam, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
E-mail Addresses:lyoo@konkuk.ac.kr
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS

No comments:

Post a Comment